|
Post by stolide on Jan 10, 2009 7:56:04 GMT -5
I didn't bother reading it. Your graph is amazingly incorrect. Void is the lack of energy. It is volatile because areas of high density always flow to areas of low density, kind of like water flowing down hill. Core is highly dense energy and is amazingly stable. Soul, even more so. Making up names for intermediates is not helpful.
I'm not sure how you are defining "high" and "low." You need to define all of your terms. Apparently you also need more experience using these energies...
|
|
|
Post by lefttooth on Jan 10, 2009 14:18:49 GMT -5
You should of at least read this part. . . 90% of the information is from my own research, so be nice while you flame me for fallacies. As this is my first article, thanks for pointing out I can be more clear on terms. I'll modify it a little so that the terms are more clear. As for void, as I couldnt find a definition, I made my own. Every time I see the word void, in connection with psi, it is always "void energy". Perhaps it would be best if we re-named it "void anti-energy". In which case, I can re-do the graph to exclude it. It fits in the graph through your explanation exactly where I put it, if it were an energy. As for core, once again, it fits were I put it. On the stable end of the graph. Soul, the same. Please read the sentence directly above the graph. As for the names, they were used because the name has something to do with the properties of said energy. Take for instance "catalytic". That stems from catalyst, and we all know what that is. The names were more for the newer psions to use as a reference point, and not for the more advanced who don't care what the name is, as long as they can use it. I have, however, modified the descriptions of said energy somewhat to more fit yours. Thank you for that. I hope you dont view this as an attack, Stolide. It is just me defending myself. lt
|
|
|
Post by stolide on Jan 10, 2009 22:38:33 GMT -5
I wasn't flaming, flaming is far more brutal, well at least in my opinion.
Void isn't anti energy, it is the lack of energy, not the opposite. The sentence above the graph greatly devalues the whole thing. It basically says: "Don't say I did the graph wrong because anything on the graph can be anywhere due to different circumstances." That statement isn't true, but meh.
|
|
|
Post by Orion on Jan 25, 2009 12:25:45 GMT -5
I agree with stolide; I don't work much with what you call "void energy," but from what I've heard and occasionally experienced, it's not an energy in its own right. Any newbie to psionics reading this article would be pretty confused - in fact, I've just read it twice, and I'm still confused too! What do you mean by "volatile" and "stable"? How do you define high and low energies? And what do all those names, like psycho-plasmatic, even mean? They sound like they came straight out of a bad sci-fi novel! As I believe Stolide has already mentioned, making up names and applying them to energies seemingly randomly does not help anybody out.
|
|
Chaotic Seraph
Student
Training w/ Arnick2
Angel no more; I provide luck that turns to curse.
Posts: 120
|
Post by Chaotic Seraph on Jan 27, 2009 19:20:59 GMT -5
Volatile is easy to explode and stable means the opposite, but I dont think that really fits with energy. Energy doesnt explode. By high and low energy I think he means high and low frequency and I have no idea what psycho-plasmatic means. Thats my best guesses.
|
|